Paper · 2015 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Biological feasibility, economic viability and energy efficiency of intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)

A K DHAKA; R K PANNU; SATISH KUMAR; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at CCSHAU, Hisar during kharif seasons of 2011 and 2012 with ten treatments in randomized block design replicated thrice to evaluate the intercropping of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata) grown for seed. Results revealed that 1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops. Hence, for seed production sesbania was sown at 90 cm spacing intercropped with three rows of fodder sorghum in between two rows of sesbania to supplement the income of farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
sesbania equivalent yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.99 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest land equivalent ratio (1.52).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
land equivalent ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.52e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
system productivity indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.69 tonnes/hae0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
monetary advantage indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13 119 Rupees/hae0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.20×103 Rupees/hae0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest B:C ratio (1.24).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.24e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ)).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
Energy productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ)e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:3 sesbania–sorghum intercrop at 22.5 cm had the highest system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha).

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
system net energy returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
625.4×103 MJ/hae0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercrop reduced sesbania seed yield by 14.8% against sole cropping.

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
sesbania seed yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
14.8%e0
Comparator
sole cropping of both cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intercrop reduced sorghum fodder yield by 41.3% against sole cropping.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment
1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacinge0
Outcome
sorghum fodder yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
41.3%e0
Comparator
sole cropping of both cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“1:3 row ratio of sesbania and sorghum at 22.5 cm spacing was found most economical and feasible intercropping system among all the treatments with highest sesbania equivalent yield (1.99 tonnes/ha), land equivalent ratio (1.52), system productivity index (1.69 tonnes/ha), monetary advantage index (13 119 Rupees/ha), net return (7.20×103 Rupees/ha), B:C ratio (1.24), Energy productivity (0.21 sesbania equivalent yield (kg/MJ) and system net energy return (625.4×103 MJ/ha) along with 14.8% and 41.3% reduction in sesbania seed yield and sorghum fodder yield, respectively, over sole cropping of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–892 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend sesbania at 90 cm with three fodder sorghum rows for seed production and farmer income.

Taxon
Sesbania aculeataSesbania bispinosat0
Outcome
sesbania was sown at 90 cm spacing intercropped with three rows of fodder sorghum in between two rows of sesbaniae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesbania bispinosa
Sesbania bispinosa · TaxonXufanc · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“intercropping fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in seed crop of dhaincha (Sesbania aculeata)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–159 · show in text ↑
e0

“for seed production sesbania was sown at 90 cm spacing intercropped with three rows of fodder sorghum in between two rows of sesbania to supplement the income of farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1070 · show in text ↑

Sorghum · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

density · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 26 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

density · yield · Sesbania bispinosa (prickly sesban)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.