Paper · 2008 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Impact of Training System on Vine Performance and Fruit Composition of Traminette

Bruce P. Bordelon; Patricia A. Skinkis; Paul H. Howard

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The performance of own-rooted Traminette vines was investigated over a 5-year period on three training systems: high cordon (HC), midwire cordon (MWC), and Scott Henry (SH). Yield, vine size, and canopy density were strongly influenced by training system. Berry composition (soluble solids, pH, titratable acidity and monoterpenes) was only slightly influenced by training system. Vines trained to divided-canopy SH had the highest yield and largest vine size, resulting in 5-year mean crop load (ratio of yield to cane pruning weight) of 7.8, which is at the low end of the generally accepted appropriate range of 8 to 12. Midwire cordon vines were 22% lower yielding, but with similar vine size, resulting in a lower than desired 5-year mean crop load of 6.0. High-cordon vines had moderate yield and vine size, and a 5-yr mean crop load of 8.1. Canopy density as measured by point quadrat analysis differed between training systems. High-cordon vines had dense canopies with four leaf layers, 2% gaps, and less than 20% exposed clusters, while SH and MWC vines had one to two leaf layers, approximately 10% gaps, and 40% exposed clusters. Despite differences in canopy density and crop load ratios, fruit composition at harvest was similar for all training systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott Henry vines had the highest yield and largest vine size.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
divided-canopy SHe0
Outcome
yield and largest vine sizee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Vines trained to divided-canopy SH had the highest yield and largest vine size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott Henry vines had a five-year mean crop load of 7.8.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Outcome
crop loade0
Value
7.8e0
Qualifier
5-yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“5-year mean crop load (ratio of yield to cane pruning weight) of 7.8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midwire cordon vines yielded 22% less.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
Midwire cordone0
Outcome
yieldinge0
Direction
lowere0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Midwire cordon vines were 22% lower yielding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–668 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midwire cordon vine size was similar.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Outcome
vine sizee0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but with similar vine size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Midwire cordon mean crop load was 6.0, below the desired range.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Outcome
crop loade0
Direction
lower than desirede0
Value
6.0e0

Verbatim

e0

“lower than desired 5-year mean crop load of 6.0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 713–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cordon vines had moderate yield and vine size.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
High-cordone0
Outcome
yield and vine sizee0
Direction
moderatee0

Verbatim

e0

“High-cordon vines had moderate yield and vine size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–812 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cordon vines had a five-year mean crop load of 8.1.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Outcome
crop loade0
Value
8.1e0
Qualifier
5-yre0

Verbatim

e0

“a 5-yr mean crop load of 8.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cordon vines had four leaf layers.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
High-cordone0
Outcome
leaf layerse0
Value
four leaf layerse0

Verbatim

e0

“High-cordon vines had dense canopies with four leaf layers, 2% gaps, and less than 20% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cordon vines had 2% canopy gaps.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
High-cordone0
Outcome
gapse0
Value
2%e0

Verbatim

e0

“High-cordon vines had dense canopies with four leaf layers, 2% gaps, and less than 20% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-cordon vines had less than 20% exposed clusters.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
High-cordone0
Outcome
exposed clusterse0
Value
less than 20%e0

Verbatim

e0

“High-cordon vines had dense canopies with four leaf layers, 2% gaps, and less than 20% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott Henry and midwire cordon vines had one to two leaf layers.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
SH and MWCe0
Outcome
leaf layerse0
Value
one to two leaf layerse0

Verbatim

e0

“SH and MWC vines had one to two leaf layers, approximately 10% gaps, and 40% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott Henry and midwire cordon vines had approximately 10% gaps.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
SH and MWCe0
Outcome
gapse0
Value
approximately 10%e0

Verbatim

e0

“SH and MWC vines had one to two leaf layers, approximately 10% gaps, and 40% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scott Henry and midwire cordon vines had 40% exposed clusters.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Treatment
SH and MWCe0
Outcome
exposed clusterse0
Value
40%e0

Verbatim

e0

“SH and MWC vines had one to two leaf layers, approximately 10% gaps, and 40% exposed clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit composition at harvest was similar across training systems.

Taxon
Traminettet0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
all training systemse0
Outcome
fruit compositione0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fruit composition at harvest was similar for all training systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Traminette”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–81 · show in text ↑