Paper · 2009 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effects of growing medium on the interactions between biocontrol agents and tomato root pathogens in a closed hydroponic system

Sammar Khalil; Malin Hultberg; Beatrix W. Alsanius

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThree commercial biocontrol agents [Trichoderma polysporum plus T. harzianum (Binab T), Gliocladium cantenulatum (Gliomix), and Streptomyces griseoviridis (Mycostop)] were evaluated for their ability to reduce root diseases caused by Pythium aphanidermatum, Phytophthora cryptogea, or Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici in hydroponically-grown tomatoes. Studies were performed using two types of growing medium, peat or pumice, under controlled conditions in a closed irrigation system. The level of disease control varied depending on the biocontrol agent, growing medium, and pathogen. In pumice, amendment with Binab T, Gliomix, or Mycostop reduced the levels and disease incidence of all three pathogens. However, Mycostop had no significant effect on the level of any of the three pathogens in peat, although Binab T and Gliomix both achieved successful biocontrol. In both growth media, biocontrol of F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici was poor compared with that of P. aphanidermatum or P. cryptogea. Overall, tomato plant growth increased after the introduction of any of the biocontrol agents, in the presence of any of the three pathogens, compared with the untreated controls.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol varied by agent, medium and pathogen.

Outcome
level of disease controle0
Qualifier
biocontrol agent, growing medium, and pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The level of disease control varied depending on the biocontrol agent, growing medium, and pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–605 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pumice, Binab T reduced disease levels and incidence of all three tomato root pathogens.

Treatment
amendment with Binab Te0
Interactor
Pythium aphanidermatumPythium aphanidermatume2pathogen
Outcome
levels and disease incidence of all three pathogense0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
pumicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pumice, amendment with Binab T, Gliomix, or Mycostop reduced the levels and disease incidence of all three pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pythium aphanidermatum, Phytophthora cryptogea, or Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pumice, Gliomix reduced disease levels and incidence of all three tomato root pathogens.

Treatment
Gliomixe0
Outcome
levels and disease incidence of all three pathogense0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
pumicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pumice, amendment with Binab T, Gliomix, or Mycostop reduced the levels and disease incidence of all three pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pumice, Mycostop reduced disease levels and incidence of all three tomato root pathogens.

Treatment
Mycostope0
Outcome
levels and disease incidence of all three pathogense0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
pumicee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In pumice, amendment with Binab T, Gliomix, or Mycostop reduced the levels and disease incidence of all three pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–726 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycostop had no significant effect on levels of the three pathogens in peat.

Treatment
Mycostope0
Outcome
level of any of the three pathogense0
Direction
no significant effecte0
Setting
peate0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycostop had no significant effect on the level of any of the three pathogens in peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–821 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Binab T achieved biological control in peat.

Treatment
Binab Te0
Outcome
successful biocontrole0
Setting
peate2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Binab T and Gliomix both achieved successful biocontrol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“three pathogens in peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–821 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gliomix achieved biological control in peat.

Treatment
Gliomixe0
Outcome
successful biocontrole0
Setting
peate2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Binab T and Gliomix both achieved successful biocontrol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–888 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
e2

“three pathogens in peat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–821 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici was poorer than for Pythium aphanidermatum or Phytophthora cryptogea in both media.

Interactor
F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersiciFusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersicie0pathogen
Outcome
biocontrol of F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersicie0
Direction
poore0
Comparator
P. aphanidermatum or P. cryptogeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both growth media, biocontrol of F. oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici was poor compared with that of P. aphanidermatum or P. cryptogea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“hydroponically-grown tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–370 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Introducing any biocontrol agent increased tomato growth with any of the three pathogens relative to untreated controls.

Treatment
introduction of any of the biocontrol agentse0
Outcome
tomato plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
presence of any of the three pathogense0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, tomato plant growth increased after the introduction of any of the biocontrol agents, in the presence of any of the three pathogens, compared with the untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1210 · show in text ↑

biocontrol · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.